Questions on Palette and Light Palette operation and features
Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:00 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia


Post by jamesholt » Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:34 pm

From http://www.strandlighting.com/clientupl ... _swv10.pdf
Classic Palette Brochure wrote:Screen layouts and network communications use XML, making it easy to communicate with other cool products (and not just ours) over the network.
I haven't seen any reference to XML or details of the Palette network protocols in the current documentation. Is there something I'm missing?

Using XML for some configuration files would present a great opportunity to make the software infinitely customisable by allowing advanced users to mix and match interface elements as they please (themeing so to say) - no more complaints about this-and-that colour not being right for so-and-so, users with silver palettes could arrange the S&M bubbles (ooh eer, kinky!) on screen to match the physical tile layout, users could hide elements of the interface they don't like, etc etc... far beyond the current 5 "console personality" options.

Adding the ability to export show files into a (reduced) XML format and opening up network protocols would bring new power to programs like FocusTrack (e.g. it could tell the desk to bring up a position look based on its id hash over a LAN) and maybe start a push for an XML-based upgrade to the ASCII Light Cues file format (read: pseudo-standardisation).

Sure it's all a bit pie-in-the-sky, but this software is supposed to be future-proof and leading the way... thoughts?
James Holt

User avatar
Posts: 2483
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:51 am
Location: Livingston, NJ


Post by BobbyHarrell » Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:20 pm

All interesting ideas that we need to dialogue about more.
Bobby Harrell - Product Specialist
Philips Entertainment - Strand Lighting

User avatar
Posts: 1233
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:51 pm
Primary Venue / Use: Other
Where I Am: International Man of Mystery
Location: Sydney, Australia


Post by JohnGrimshaw » Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:50 pm

There are quite a few inaccuracies with the Strand documentation (the software development is moving faster then the marketing dept). I tend to NOT give these to clients.

That said, the whole XML issue does open some real potential for those personalised "tweaks" that an operator would like - including Software Settings, Hardware Settings, screen colours, soft key layouts, multiple language support, default show configuration(s), and so on.

It would also allow for "portability" of these settings.

Presumably, it would be a programming nightmare to implement, but bitten of a chunk at a time it could work. There are other features that I would like to see happen first though!
...and for more entertainment industry trivia and useless facts, just ask:
John Grimshaw
Managing Director
Stage Fast Pty Ltd

User avatar
Posts: 500
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:00 pm
Primary Venue / Use: Other
Where I Am: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania USA
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania


Post by AlanMartello » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:52 pm

And from experience, Microsoft has gone down that path with their latest development environments (Visual Studio 2005 and 2008). Developers could tweak to their hearts content. Unfortunately things are so confusing, convoluted and if you place one character wrong, the whole thing breaks.

It's worse than editing the registry and (basically) no one touches it.

Flexible customization is a good idea. XML is likely not the right approach.

Thanks for calling this to our attention. The marketing types have been made aware of the lingering inaccuracies.
Alan Martello, Ph.D. - System Architect - Horizon Control Inc.

Post Reply